Wrestling with Reality

Eldwood P. Dowd (Jim Parsons) must be the nicest character in American theater.  Within a minute of being onstage, he has enthusiastically accepted two subscriptions to Lady’s Home Journal and Good Housekeeping and invited the telemarketer over to his home.  Later, an elderly lady (Carol Kane), tells him that a Dr. McClure is having a party for his sister from Wichita.  “I didn’t know Dr. McClure had a sister in Wichita,” he says with interest.  “Oh—do you know Dr. McClure?” the lady asks.  “No,” he replies, without any sense of having behaved unusually.  And when his sister, Veta (Jessica Hecht), tries to have him committed to a sanatorium, he is not angry but simply admires her tenacity.

Jimmy Stewart, who played Elwood twice on Broadway as well as in the 1950 movie, was an obvious choice for the role.  His calm and soothing demeanor, his earnest persona suit Elwood perfectly.  Of course, there is more to Mr. Dowd than his Boy Scout charm.  He is also an alcoholic mourning the loss of his mother as well as the best friend of the eponymous Harvey, a six foot one and a half-inch tall rabbit.  Behind his pristine manners and his inexhaustible interest in strangers is a profound sadness, the melancholy of a little boy who has lost the only woman he has ever loved.  His alcoholism and his insanity, the latter often providing fodder for the play’s comedy, is nevertheless destroying Veta and her daughter, Myrtle Mae (Tracee Chimo).

This new revival of Harvey fails because it does not tap into that sadness.  Mr. Parsons is great when playing the eccentric bachelor, but his director, Scott Ellis, has not pushed him to tap into the depressive aspects of Mary Chase’s play.  There is a gorgeous moment when Elwood describes his experiences in bars: “The faces of the other people turn towards mine and smile.  They are saying, ‘We don’t know your name, Mister, but you’re a lovely fellow.’ … They tell about the big terrible things they have done.  The big wonderful things they will do.  Their hopes, their regrets, their loves, their hates.  All very large because nobody ever brings anything small into a bar.”  This is an image and this is writing worthy of Harry Hope’s saloon.  But where Jimmy Stewart could speak with both ecstasy and misery, Mr. Parsons only hits the comedic notes; he only plays the aloof and disconnected Elwood, all to the loss of the play’s power.

Granted, Harvey is no masterpiece anyway—and it has become particularly dated in its depiction of gender roles.  Elwood insists on standing up until all ladies present are seated, calls them “my dear,” and chastises a doctor for not being more gentlemanly.  In 1944, he may have struck an audience as refreshingly old-fashioned, but his gratuitous chivalry is now at best sickeningly cute and at worst supremely patronizing.   His love interest, the nurse Ruth Kelly (Holley Fain), is rarely given a line that does not involve either praising Elwood or criticizing her “modern” and therefore ungallant boyfriend Dr. Lyman Sanderson (Morgan Spector).

Still, despite the play’s flaws, it would have been nice to see a more challenging Harvey.  Mr. Parsons, after all, is an excellent actor; here, he—and the play—have been mishandled.

Harvey runs through August 5th at Studio 54.  254 W. 54th Street  New York, NY.

Advertisements
Aaron Botwick

2 thoughts on “Wrestling with Reality

  1. I have not yet seen the play with Jim Parson, as I am seeing it on July 7th, but your review is obviously only your opinion. I have seen the film with Jimmy Stewart several times. I will wait until I see it for myself, as I love Jim Parsons and do feel that he will revive the role that James Stewart portrayed in as much credibility as any actor could do when portraying another actor’s role. You mention that it’s ‘dated’, well, it is from the 1940’s. What did you expect?!!! Be realistic in your review…!

    1. True, Harvey is almost seventy years old, but a good revival should still feel fresh, or at least be conscious of its anachronisms–recent productions of Death of a Salesman (1949), A Streetcar Named Desire (1947), and ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore (c.1629) have proved just as engaging and relevant as any new play. Not to mention all the great Shakespeare we get here in New York.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s